Presented by Luke Matthews - Email: lmatthews@calrice.org
In the face of large-scale changes to agricultural practices, we developed a survey to better understand how environmental and economic factors shape the decisions made by rice growers related to post-harvest practices on their farms. We sent a comprehensive survey to 1,650 rice growers to solicit information on post-harvest management of fields, costs of common post-harvest treatments, water-related costs of rice agriculture, and views of growers towards wildlife and hunting. We achieved a 20.2% response rate (based on American Association for Public Opinion Research 4.0 calculations). Key observations from our survey include the following: 1) 89% of rice farmers and landowner allow hunting on their property; 27% of those collect fees from leases, which enables them to recoup 63% of their water costs. 2) Over 80% of respondents view rice as either ‘very important’ or ‘somewhat important’ as both food and habitat for wildlife, despite the observation that 70% and 60% of grower’s experience wildlife related losses in the spring and fall respectively. 3) 50% of respondents indicated that water costs would be the primary factors causing them to stop post-harvest flooding. The average water cost that growers were willing to pay, before shifting away from flooding, was approximately $24/acre. 4) Finally, when asked which post-harvest treatment growers would use if they did not have winter water, 89% of the respondents would select to incorporate waste straw (using a variety of methods).Q.1-7: Rice Agriculture and Wildlife Conservation in California: A grower’s perspective
Luke Matthews, California Rice Commission, Sacramento, California
Dr. Mark Lubell, Environmental Science and Policy, UC Davis, Davis, California
Dr. John Eadie, Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, UC Davis, Davis, California
Dr. Mark Lubell, Environmental Science and Policy, UC Davis, Davis, California
Dr. John Eadie, Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, UC Davis, Davis, California